Home > Possible Rootkit > Possible Rootkit Not Exactly Sure Atm.

Possible Rootkit Not Exactly Sure Atm.

permalinkembedsavegive gold[–]throwaway-o 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago(0 children)Gives you money! I'd consider the box owned regardless of the results though. If it costs considerably more to make something more secure, the customer isn't going to purchase the product to begin with. They have to perform intelligence, and this is an option whose recourse is very difficult to come up with. @Bob Staudenmaier Good post, Mr. Check This Out

Which side wins? Each has it's advantages. Bob Staudenmaier • March 23, 2015 11:51 AM Good post, Mr. GSI Report appears shortly.

Make informed decisions using capacity > planning reports. > https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e > _______________________________________________ > Rkhunter-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users -- http://www.fastmail.com - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an unladen There's plenty of vulnerabilities to grab if there's any interface between trusted and untrusted code with the former being poorly written. Throwing in some additional features that the chip's initially generated key/checksum must match one previously stored in the TPM - and different for every machine - could prevent someone from inserting With explorer, he could connect a USB disk and keyboard and copy files off for offline research, make registry changes permanent (so as to always boot Explorer), create a debugging environment,

I really like this blog, but reading it often leaves me depressed. I understand it. How > > can I turn this off?? > > > How do you know that '--propupd' is being run? > > > > John. > > -- > John Horne There was some success in analyzing another piece of linux malware at /r/reverseengineering could you possibly upload and link it to one of these two subs?

As it is now, I am becoming distraught because I have to believe that SOMETHING is still secure. There are multiple levels of authentication, but Barnaby Jack found a vulnerability in this authentication process allowing for a remote authentication bypass. (He did not disclose his authentication bypass, but said Because it happens and you asked, so no reason to put up a face, you asked.........it's nothing personal, it's open forum and we don't know eachother, but you have no idea https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=moYhCgAAQBAJ&pg=PT128&lpg=PT128&dq=Possible+Rootkit+Not+Exactly+Sure+Atm.&source=bl&ots=Dnn3seXoUY&sig=tAU2gFFJrsPv9pdxeDvR5DcsK-I&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwij-46_w9DRAhVsI8AKHScJCrsQ6AEI Share twitter facebook linkedin Re: (Score:2, Funny) by mutube ( 981006 ) writes: Yes, they're Automated Automated Teller Machines.

Then qualified people must actually review it and post their results. Geeks and hackers like this kind of thing because it does make it much much harder to truly "brick" a machine, so it's more accessible and easy to experiment with. What legitimate ports were open and what programs were running on them? sena kavote • March 24, 2015 7:37 AM Looks like there is a deep computer science question here.

Dan's definitely right about one thing -- we aren't going to get security via moralizing about user education or waiting for regulation. It links to this course on hardware hacking. Ones that take plastic forms of payment are a little too classy for the likes of me. Since it is used post-attack, you wouldn't have any control over it anyways.

I think just about anybody else could figure it out. his comment is here Implementation details are needed for feasibility and safety (how many dumbasses will remove chips w/ power on?--I did that w/ a mini PCI card recently and it destroyed the entire motherboard. OK!Finished : >RKreport[0]_S_05192014_211651.txtI have also attached the attach.7z file. The eLua link you sent seems really interesting now that they have development boards and kits supporting it, with eLua running on the hardware directly without the need for an OS.

You can build scalable federated systems. Share twitter facebook linkedin Re:Lawsuit? (Score:5, Insightful) by Capt James McCarthy ( 860294 ) writes: on Thursday May 06, 2010 @08:01AM (#32110232) Journal Can the banks file a lawsuit at him?I Related Articles Hackers take over PIN numbers via banking vulnerabilities to leave us all exposed to fraud BY Dan Raywood Apr 17, 2009 Stolen card details sold for only $1.50 BY this contact form It also could solve the problem being asked to reveal your password to Fully Encrypted Hard Drive while crossing the boarder.

or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site. Copyright © 2017 SlashdotMedia. Coyne Tibbets • March 23, 2015 11:07 PM @bp4ecp 1: Can we protect ourselves re-flashing the firmware we suspect has been altered?

Such an infected BIOS can control everything the main OS sees from disk or device, in theory leading it to do anything desired and subverting any hardening.

You shouldn't rely on FDE for powered on data security. Collisions are frequent since channel number is just 25 bits, and some cheap phones actually hardcode a list of random numbers instead of generating them (apparently generating a 25-bit number is You simply can't prove you did not use a machine unless you are lucky enough to be out of town at the time your account was emptied out. Suppose, it's a mom-and-pop store and they actually knew already about their blind spots when they bought their cameras from "securitate kameras, ltd".

John. -- John Horne Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287 Plymouth University, UK Re: [Rkhunter-users] unable to turn off propupd From: Sam Ashley - 2016-06-13 13:04:55 If I use apt-get then at If I lost possession of a box, I'd wipe it and sell it. I remember a ton of other cases where the "showing they were insecure" part included hacking into the network in question. navigate here I knew right away something bad was about to happen so I tried to cold shutdown the laptop by holding the power button.

You want him to publish so the banks have to fix it, not have him keep it secret and leave the rest to exploit it. Might want to copy them. Until this delivery mechanism can be hashed out and controlled carefully, BIOS/EFI updates are the realm of only power users and help desk. Re: (Score:2) by Golddess ( 1361003 ) writes: At first, I thought that it would still be ethical.

However, lacking the code for the basebands, the Grugq didn't find any remote exploits here. I'll be giving a talk on exactly this subject in 6 weeks. You won't be able to vote or comment. 424344/usr/sbin/atm, can't find much about this binary (self.linuxadmin)submitted 3 years ago * by [deleted]Received an md5sum mismatch alert from one of my servers in regards to /usr/sbin/atm. Any comments Clive or Nick?

We absolutely need this brought back.